Tuesday, October 24, 2017

Breaking News: Clinton and Democrats Pay for False Dossier

The Trump-Russia collusion story is based on a secret paper which the Washington Post, a Clinton loving newspaper, now says was paid by Clinton and the Democrats. No doubt that 'sunlight disinfects'. As the corruption of the left is exposed to the light of truth, more and more of their deceit and lies will evaporate.
The Clinton's Crime Syndicate under scrutiny

Friday, October 13, 2017

Tax Rhetoric Hides Real Issue

Media Noise on Tax Reform
Talk about tax reform is everywhere in the news these days. The media tells us that the proposed changes are bad for us. Understandably, those proposing the changes disagree. So what does all the noise mean to you and your business?
The problem with the subject of taxation is that it poses special difficulties to those attempting to forecast outcomes. It's possible for diametrically opposed tax plans to promise the same positive outcome, for example. Therefore, the subject lends itself to manipulation by unethical politicians and news people alike. The natural complexity also serves to hide what's really important to all of us. So, let's understand the effects of tax changes. Then, let's consider the real threat to the wellbeing of our nation; a subject no one is talking about.
To understand why tax reform outcomes are so difficult to interpret we need to look at how complex systems work. Complex systems act in a seemingly random fashion as participants within the system change their behavior in response to other participants.
Let me explain with the following scenario. Assume that we get together a thousand of the smartest PhD's in the country. We'll call them the Federal Reserve or FED for short.
Picture of Federal Reserve Board, circa 1917
Federal Reserve Board, 1917
This FED has the responsibility to ensure a better economic future for all of us. The FED will study the economic market; a flexible group of players following their self interest. Then, when it sees trouble ahead, the FED will intervene to prevent any negative outcomes. Ironically, the FED will thus become the largest player in the system.
This game really begun in December of 1913. So far, the super smart people at the FED have never anticipated a single economic downturn. In fact, the FED now accepts that they are 'data dependant'; they admit to being myopic. Without visibility past their nose, they utterly 'depend' on where 'data' is right now. To make matters more confusing, other players follow every action by the FED as a sign of what's to come. It's a real case of the blind leading the blind.
At times, complex systems follow a single general direction. For example, we know that more people in a market will make the number of transactions grow. While the relationship between number of players and number of transactions is not precise, the general correlation is positive. As population has continued to grow, the number of transactions has done the same in what looks like limitless duration.  
Complex System
But then there are times when these systems periodically return to their base or mean. Market risk is a good example. The risk faced by market players alters direction because it can't continue to increase or decrease indefinitely.
The problem with complex systems is that they represent the total combination of many of these two types of movements. At times, linear movements dominate only to suddenly give in to reversion to the mean.
Think about it. It's even possible for the same participants to act differently when faced with the same circumstances. Their actions could be altered by their memory of recent success or failure, for example.
All these facts make it impossible to establish rigid expectations. So don't be surprised when the smartest scientist can't guess the path of a hurricane a few days before it makes land or when the Federal Reserve makes a catastrophic mistake with the economy. Both, the economy and the weather are complex systems. Likewise, do you really expect the TV host to be able to correctly determine what will happen after a new tax structure is implemented? No chance.
Here, please pardon the fact that I took way too long to elaborate my point; I really wanted to make it very clear. News people are as clueless as any of us. Don't waste your time listening to their opinion disguised as a news fact. For a more productive outcome, read a fiction novel instead.
Still, the media will try to convince you. And since most of the media has a left bias, they'll generally argue that paying more taxes and a bigger government are better.
Government Skeptics
Now that if you see big government with skepticism, don't distress. You are not alone. In fact, you are in great company. Our nation's forefathers shared the same skepticism. This is why our constitution was written to limit government power.
Our constitution has served us well for close to 230 years; resulting in the most successful nation in history. Our system is in fact so great that countries all around the world voluntarily adopt many of its characteristics. Subsequently, billions of people have left poverty behind.
Yes, before Europeans started to brag about their young and relatively untested socialist system of big government and heavy taxation, they needed our help rebuilding after their past mistakes. So, when the left leaning media tries to tell you that European's pay more taxes and manage to live better than we do, remember that their opinion isn't so correct.
Look at Holland. To get all the extra goodies dished out by their government, the land of public sex displays has severely mortgaged their future. To revert path, Holland will have to cut national expenditures by 10% and then endure 10 years of doubling tax rates to 100%. Their debt is so humongous that it can only be solved with 10 years of complete slavery to the government. Now you see why their politicians are so happy. There is more than cannabis behind their smirk.
Historic Tax Rates
Another strong argument the media exploits to defend their position is that higher post-WWII taxes resulted in a better economy for the US. Here again, they are missing about half of the complex system's picture. Yes, the US had tremendously high taxes in paper after WWII. But no, people didn't actually pay them.
Does anyone recall that business schools were nonexistent until much after the big war? Before universities found a way to educate future business leaders most CEO's were attorneys. Back then, being a lawyer was essential for guiding a company around government regulation.
Tax rates down; tax revenue up.
When looking at government tax receipts on a per capita basis and adjusted to inflation, it's sad to see that we pay much higher taxes today than we did after WWII despite having a lower rate. The chart clearly shows how tax rates have gone down while tax collections have gone up.
Reagan found that tax evasion eased when taxes were seen as reasonable. The inverse of this fact is why Greece collects no taxes at all. When taxes are unbelievably high, people will do anything not to pay.
In the economic complex system, players will be more willing to increase their activity in an environment of fair taxation. Then, higher player activity will conceivably result in tax receipts sufficient enough to compensate for the loss by rate reductions. This is when politicians use the term "revenue neutral". Nonetheless, don't believe them when they use it. Both sides can easily claim revenue neutrality from clearly opposing plans.
Yet, tax receipts won't be enough for our present government expenditures. Right now, our government borrows an additional 48 cents for every dollar in taxes we pay them. It's clear we can't afford our present government. We would need to cut government spending by 32%1 to get back to break even. This will do nothing about paying off our debt. We would simply stop the bleeding.
US Total Budget, 2016
Look at the pie chart here and tell me what part of government would you cut to get the 32% reduction? I bet you can't. We are accustomed to the good stuff even when clearly insolvent.
Then, to compound our challenges, we spend the equivalent to little less than half of our massive military budget on interest payments alone. We are buried under a pile of debt.
Do you want to experience real fear? Consider the fact that our debt pays close to zero percent in interests. Think of it, if interest rates go to their 4% long term average, we will be spending double the current military budget on interests alone.
Let me make my opinion clear. Talking about taxes is important. But the real conversation to have is about debt. We are broke. We have to tighten the belt and figure how to get us back to balance sheet health. We can argue the best way to solve it. But there is no escaping the subject. Your business' future and that of your family are at risk. Let's redirect the conversation as soon as possible.




1 Take one dollar plus 48 cents. Then calculate it's inverse. Then subtract 1 to come up with the 32 cents or 32% needed in lower government expenditures to bring us back to a point where we are not borrowing any more money.

Saturday, October 7, 2017

Sound Management after Music Paradigm

You're coaching one of your managers, but all you get is the 'deer in the headlights' look. You try to be clear. Your manager's actions and body language around the office are sending a conflicting messages to the team. The unintended result is that team's productivity and focus is suffering.
composite photo image of manager with 'deer in the headlights' look.next to a low performance chart Frustratingly, your point isn't getting through. Your manager blames the team for all shortfalls. There's no understanding that the problem is managerial in nature. You're even told that performance isn't "so bad".
But you know better. You know the difference. You know what's missing in their performance.
Why hasn't anyone developed a tool to solve your problem? You believe in coaching your team to help them reach higher levels of effectiveness. You know that everybody wins wherever there's exceptional productivity. So, having a way to clearly show what happens to your team's performance when management is executed exceptionally well would be fantastic indeed. But how to make it tactile enough so that anyone can 'touch and feel' the difference?
Well, your cry has been heard.
There is a fantastic tool for leaders who want to take their team beyond common daily platitudes and towards a clear understanding of those special aspects that cause maximum performance out of professional teams.
But be ready to be surprised because the solution to your challenge is not the usual rigid presentation where a very smart person talks to your team while they vigorously attempt to take notes. No. The right way to teach your all stars is through music. Yes, you read it right. Music!
Enter Music Paradigm; the brainchild of Maestro Roger Nierenberg.
color picture of Music Paradigm's founder, Maestro Roger Nierenberg
Maestro Roger Nierenberg
With a world class resume, Maestro Nierenberg has recorded with the London Philharmonic and conducted at both the Prague Spring Festival and the Beijing Festival. He has guest-conducted the National Symphony, the Opera Theatre of Saint Louis, the Detroit Symphony, the Saint Louis Symphony, the Baltimore Symphony, the Indianapolis Symphony, the San Diego Symphony and many other great American orchestras. Master Nierenberg  also had long, successful tenures as Music Director of both the Stamford Symphony in Connecticut and the Jacksonville Symphony in Florida.
One day, Maestro Nierenberg realized that orchestra directors like himself faced the same challenges as leaders who believe in hiring the best employees available. While their teams perform fine under most circumstances, the real magic only happens when management is exceptionally executed. So the idea was born to create an immersive demonstration beyond everybody's wildest dreams.
Picture this: you take your management team to an event where they will listen to the most beautiful music in the world. Moreover, they'll get a rare peek at what happens behind the scenes.
Your managers will seat side by side with professionals who have such strong commitment to their trade that they literally gave up thousands of hours of fun for a chance to improve their skill.
composite image of Music Paradigm attendants with music graphics around it.
Managerial insight during Music Paradigm
We are sure to think that people of such high commitment do not need management. It's to be expected. So, imagine how insightful it is when Maestro Nierenberg proves to you that his musicians are incredible by themselves but even better when properly managed. Music Paradigm will show you how communication can become both, immediate and effective, as long as we pay attention to others. He'll even reveal that your team knows more about your managerial faults than you dare to accept.
Maestro Nierenberg will demonstrate the value of hiring the very best. Even without formal, top-down leadership, real professionals manage in a 360 degree way that would make author John Maxwell proud.
Aside from delivering an enchanting musical experience Maestro Nierenberg obliterates misguided preconceptions on what makes a remarkable manager. The experience is fantastic at so many levels.
composite image of Music Paradigm attendants with music graphics around it.
There's only one Music Paradigm
As a leader, I have faced many challenges over the years. Being perpetually aware of the void in resources needed, I always keep an eye out for better ways to solve old problems. Thankfully, I had the luxury of witnessing Maestro Nierenberg give a group of promising managers the kind of insight unavailable anywhere else. And, since their gracious invitation allowed me to bring my wife, we also experienced a memorable musical presentation. Without fear of being hyperbolic, I can tell you that Music Paradigm is as special as a visit to Machu Picchu on a wonderfully sunny day. I learned so much while admiring incredible beauty. What are you waiting for? Call Music Paradigm today to schedule the same experience for your team. There is only one Machu Picchu just like there is only one Music Paradigm.

Contact Information:
The Music Paradigm
http://www.musicparadigm.com/
862-849-2429
info@musicparadigm.com

Wednesday, October 4, 2017

Black Friday Boom


Could this coming Friday be our economy's Black Friday? No, not Thanksgiving's Black Friday when all companies finally make a profit for the year. 
S&P Index Futures show a peak being formed
Instead, is this Friday going to become the top of the equities and bond bubbles artificially created by the Federal Reserve?
Surely I am not talking about bubbles that made things better for all of us. The recent highs in the equities market have demonstrated that while Wall Street can be joyfully celebrating, 'main street' can continue to suffer all along from a post-recessionary hangover.
During Obama's term, the cost of money for large organizations went so low that many CEO's decided to mortgage their company's future by padding their own bank accounts with lots of options on shares bought back from the market on borrowed money.
Stock Buybacks
This was a clear misallocation of resources; of the kind that central governments often incentivize. The cheap money allowed CEO's to buy back shares, thus improving the per share profit performance. This in turn made CEO's look so good that their job-well-done was rewarded with stock options. In a way, cheap Fed money allowed a transfer of wealth from investors to CEO's. Let's also remember that in a few years, all the current CEO's will be gone and not held to account any more. Yet, all company loans will have to be repaid with the future profits that would otherwise go to investors. You got to love the way the game is played. The stock market's optimistic booming picture disproportionally benefits company leaders more than any other stakeholder group.
Meanwhile, Obama also brought us a drying of the otherwise available capital that was needed for small business growth. For eight years, the cost of borrowing sky rocketed for small businesses regardless of where the Fed set their rates. But how could this happen? Well, it all resulted of the so-called economic stimulus by the Fed.
When the government bought so many of their own bonds, through transactions between the Fed and Treasury, most low risk assets were drained out of the market. This pressed low risk-tolerance lenders to compete for higher risk corporate bonds. The greater number of lenders competing for the same number of bonds pushed prices (interests) down. At the same time, this left lender portfolios with a higher risk profile than would normally be preferred. So, they then had to increase the price (interest) for small business loans to bring their risk profile back into shape. In a nutshell, next time the government tells you they are trying to help you, the small business owner, run for the exits. No matter how many PhD's work at our central bank, their actions will continue to result in big failures similar to those from Mao Tse Tung's great leap forward where 45 million people died after their government tried to help them.
Corporate Bond Cycle
For thirty years, the Fed has pushed interests lower and lower. Always with the goal of 'helping' the economy. Today, we are at the very end of one of those cycles that reverses about every 30 years. But whether the Fed actually prices interest rates higher or not, let's remember that bond prices are no more than a gauge of trust. If capital holders trust the environment, money flows into markets. When trust is lost, prices of bonds go sky high and capital drains out of markets. Interestingly, the same trust is what holds the price of stocks high. So, it is not unreasonable to think that we could face a pivotal change in the cost of money and a pivotal change on the cost of stocks, both at the same time. While bond charts show no more signs of peaking other than their cycle's maturity, equity markets are screaming 'top" like never before.
Elliot Wave Analysis of S&P 500
First, there is the fact that most large traders set price levels using the same technical analysis that shows that we are at a point where several longterm Fibonacci studies converge as tops.
Second, many more large traders look at what is called 'Elliot Wave' which is now calling for an end of an eight year move.
Finally, it's October. You know, all bad things in the stock market happen in October.
So, whether the bond and equity tops happen this Friday or the next, it seems clear that the difference is academic at best. The end of the current run seems upon us.
But, is it possible that I could be wrong; after all, there have been many calls for the top in recent years? Well, yes. I could be wrong.
Still, this week's relentless push upwards has the characteristic price action of a top. This week's price movement seems to be creating a Doji, a well known top formation used by 'Japanese Candle Sticks' chart readers. Yes, I know it all sounds funny and surreal. Still, these people make millions of dollars every year from looking at these studies that go back centuries.
In any case, I believe that, as a leader, one must be aware of any potential change in market sentiment. If a recession starts this month, it would last at least a year and a half. During such time, loans would be called back everywhere as lenders will try to reduce their risk profile. Capital will probably dry up. In extreme cases even trust between banks could create international commerce seizures due to an absence of international letters of credit. For a single day during the last recession, this same picture became a reality and all global commerce almost came to a halt. The risks are simply too high to ignore.
You have been forewarned. Let's hope I am wrong.

Thursday, September 28, 2017

Catalonia - Democracy and Freedom

It's fortunate that Great Britain exits the European Union without war. Remember the American Civil War where confederate states were forced to remain in the union after losing? 
Well, things could get dicey for another nation seeking freedom. 
I am talking about Catalonia. This powerful industrial region has quietly existed within Spain despite strong cultural-identity differences. Catalans are about to have a referendum vote this coming weekend. They will decide on whether to separate from Spain or remain as part of it. Well, at least that's what Catalans hope to do.
Spain's central government has different plans. Madrid is not about to let their golden goose depart freely. The issue of a Catalan secession is in fact so serious that it could leave the rest of Spain facing bankruptcy. Thus, as it's usually the case in matters of money, Spain seems ready to use blunt force to ensure Catalans don't get past their already crazy idea. Madrid's government has ordered the Catalan police, also known as Mossos, to close and occupy all polling premises this Saturday and Sunday. This order extends to any area near the polling stations. The Catalan people are being threatened with criminal prosecution for participating in the referendum whether inside polling stations or outside of them.
Totalitarians: Franco, Hitler & Mussolini
To many Catalans, totalitarianism ended with the death of General Francisco Franco, the fascist military dictator who kept Catalonia oppressed for way too long. Besides hating all things Catalan, Franco kept friendship with real bad guys like Hitler and Mussolini. Needless to say, his control methods were quite brutal as well.
Sadly, things have not changed much. I think that Catalans now understand that they still live under a police state. But rather than making Catalans give up, Spain's actions are reigniting a sense of urgency to vote for independence. It is now clear that their representative government cares nothing about democracy or exercising the will of the people.
Interestingly, most Americans know little about Catalonia. Before the Barcelona Olympics in 1992, most people had never even thought about traveling to this world class Catalan capital.
La Sagrada Familia by Gaudi
And like their beautiful capital, Catalans are remarkable people as well. I should know. I spent many years visiting their historic nation full of Roman amphitheaters, medieval cities to modern marvels. I even got to understand spoken and written Catalan. To this day, I continue to have many Catalan friends.
The stereotype that people in Mediterranean countries like Italy and Greece tend to be lacier than their Nordic counterparts does not apply to Catalonia. Catalans manage to be some of the most productive business people in the world. This means that Catalans know how to work while also enjoying one of the best diets anywhere; from fantastic salads to incredible cheeses and meats. In fact, the best restaurants in the universe are in Catalonia. Both, ElBulli and El Celler de Can Roca offer food that's out of this world, literally.
Look a little closer and you will find Catalan influence everywhere around the world. Jaime Nunó, a Catalan, wrote the music for Mexico's national anthem. Have you heard about master painters Joan Miró  or Salvador Dali? There is a Salvador Dali museum in Saint Petersburg, Florida, if you are curious. How about world class tenor Jose Carreras? Follow sports? Have you heard about NBA player Pau Gasol?  Even the guy who discovered America, a fellow under the name of Christopher Columbus, is now believed to have been from Catalonia rather than Italy, as previously thought. And why not? He departed from Barcelona on his way to America.
Catalans are great people in other ways as well. While they are responsible for 19% of Spain's economic output, they account for only 11% of the national spending budget. I don't know about you, but if I had to conquer a nation, I would chose one like Catalonia. They make you lots of money while spending very little.
Obviously the same cannot be said about the rest of Spain. Taking out the other highly productive area of Spain, the Basque region, Spanish generally love a good life without much worry for toil.
It is therefore of no surprise that Catalans had enough of the abuse. Likewise, the rest of Spain have not had enough of the good stuff Catalans create.
Sadly, I think that Madrid's clear abuse of power over Catalonia is the norm rather than the exception. I believe that, given the chance, governments will take away all our freedoms in the name of national interest.
This is why the subject of Globalism is so important for all of us to understand well. The potential risks associated with the present Globalist movement are too great to dismiss. Globalists will argue that their goal is to prevent future wars by uniting all people around the world. But what they really want is a super-government where politicians will forever be protected from the risk of losing power. In a nutshell, accepting Globalism will result in permanently saying goodbye to democracy.
Look at the most obvious Globalist model, the European Union. Ask any citizen within any EU nation the following question: how can you or any other citizen remove any of the EU politicians residing in Brussels for doing a bad job?
Silence.
The EU; a politician's paradise
The short and surprising answer is that there is nothing that can be done. Brussels can create all the laws and regulations they want. Yet, citizens have no say on any of it. While people could fire their national government, changing parties in a place like France will do nothing to create even a small dent in Brussels. EU politicians have absolute power and all the impunity in the world.
But Globalists want more. The North Atlantic Treaty is the next stage on a progression towards a truly global union. I am so glad we are not part of it.
Think about it. Do you really believe that Marco Polo needed thousands of pages of contractual agreements to trade goods with Asians and Europeans? If we are honest about it, trade needs no government involvement. The Chinese renaissance started with farmers trading their surplus production outside of government oversight, not within it. Somehow, though, we have been so gullible that we bought the ridiculous idea that we needed governments for pretty much everything. Come to the middle of Florida to see what people do when a hurricane hits a rural area far from the immediate reach of government aid organizations. People help each other; that's what happens.
So what can we expect this weekend in Catalonia? Will Catalans get a chance to vote? I certainly hope so.
If Spain's central government deploys military force against the Catalan people, should we expect a revolution? I don't think so; Catalans are smarter than that.
Do I agree with a Catalan secession? Not necessarily. What I support is their democratic right to chose their future.
I don't care for the European Union and its Globalist agenda. Yet, it is highly possible that a Catalan independence would be followed by successful EU membership, even if Spain undermines Catalan efforts to join the club. In such case, Globalists would still win.
To end, I want to send a hello to all my Catalan friends. Let's hope that Madrid's forces remain peaceful and outside of your referendum efforts. In any case and regardless of your decision, Els catalans són una nació fantàstica.


The Catalan Burro continues to frustrate the Spanish Bull

2017-10-04 Update:
The referendum vote came and went. The police brutality was evident in many places as women and the elder were beaten up without mercy as the police tried to push peaceful demonstrations back. Even firefighters got into the picture when police attacked them for standing in defense of civilians.
At the end of the day, Catalans voted for independence. Yet, their government in Madrid says their vote was illegal, which is technically wrong. Being unconstitutional doesn't make it illegal. It just means that it can happen but will not be recognized. I guess that politicians will continue to paint things the best way that suits their purpose. Just look at Hillary's recent book where she blames everybody for her loss but her criminal actions.
Beyond being unconstitutional, many people say the referendum also doesn't follow international norms that call for oppression as a requisite for independence. But here again I'll throw the bullshit card. We all know that many not oppressed independence cases have been internationally accepted as long as the main global powers of US, UK and France recognize them. So, don't pee on my leg and tell me that it's raining. The truth about international laws is that they are designed to halt any progress not approved by those in power.
As for the European Union, well, it's clear that they are sold and paid for already. They are going to side with the globalists who want less independent nations rather than more of them. Besides, any attempt at a legal maneuver by Catalonia would be inhibited by the massive bureaucracy that the EU has built around what would otherwise be a simple concept. Do we remember that the US constitution fits in a small booklet smaller than a comic? Try that with the EU's version. So no hope for Catalonia there either.
I think that Catalans need to continue pressing their case without fear of missing on the chance to belong to the EU club. Switzerland is not part of the club and yet benefits from all the goodies. All Catalans need to do is maintain a solid balance sheet and a strong currency and everybody will want to associate with them. In other words, follow the example of Switzerland. Good luck!

Tuesday, August 29, 2017

Obama's Environmental Lies; Market Uncovers Truth.

Judicial Watch, Inc. v.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 
"Obama's going to end up in jail", I told my dinner party. Defensively, a young friend from Spain asked "why would he go to jail?". I told him that while I didn't know the specific broken law that would put him behind bars, Obama had broken so many laws that the possibility of him eventually falling from grace was high. Yes, the highest probability is that he won't do a single day in jail even when caught. To safeguard the integrity and honor of the office of the US president, Obama will surely receive a presidential pardon immediately after accepting guilt. But for all intents and purposes, Obama is a criminal who will be captured.
I understand why it is so difficult for many Europeans to understand why I speak of Obama, my former president, in such terms. After all, Obama was the face of the ever protecting government. Obama's promise to take care of the country in every aspect of daily life, is a message that resonated strongly with Europeans. Many Europeans love the comfort of a big government. In a way they are still emotionally shocked from the many wars they endured.
Franco
Yet, I think they're wrong. I think they're ignoring their own history. Totalitarianism, a system where government has "total" control over all aspects of its citizens' daily life, devastated country after country throughout Europe. It is clear that the fundamental reason behind the wars that so traumatized Europeans is 'big government'. Needless to say, I think Europeans misplace their trust. They're asking the wolf to watch over their chickens.
And there wasn't a bigger and meaner wolf than Obama; a man who follows the Chicago mob strategies of Saul Alinsky. The savagery first displayed by Al Capone's band, was brought to the White House with so much pomp that the news media and Hollywood fell in love with the idea of deploying the ultimate bad-soldier Army to support the ideals of the left. Under Obama, if a lie was to be told, then why not make it humongous. As a result, lies rained on American citizens for eight years.
So how do you catch a criminal in a world where your government is the criminal? What happens when police and investigators refused to incriminate their bosses? Isn't it true that we pay government the tax money needed for it to sustain a police and military force that will defend us from wrongdoing?
This is the problem with the government. It will not protect you from itself. At the core of the debate between socialism and market-based capitalism resides the size and power of government. Socialists seek the protection of a bigger government. Market faithful, on the other hand, believe that the answers will arise out of the ashes of self-interest. Honestly, the Phoenix like performance of markets seems at first sight to be more magical than real. So we shouldn't blame those of the socialist side for being skeptical; especially those with limited insight into the historical evidence.
Mao's Great Leap Forward's failure
Still, the truth is that markets work, no matter how counter intuitive they may seem. Mao Tse Tung's well intended socialism killed more than 45 million people. In an attempt to make their lives better, Mao's Great Leap Forward me the parents die of hunger, but not before they ate their children. No wonder it is said that the road to hell is paved with great intentions.
And to think the Social Justice Warriors want us to change history and condemn Christopher Columbus. From 1494 to 1508, Spaniards and Indians fought in wars that resulted in more than 3 million deaths; less than 7% of Mao's socialist damage. Let's keep in mind that Mao did his socialist magic in just four years. Clearly, socialism has a lot of explaining to do.
Social Justice Warriors
want to change history
As a system that depends on spending more value than it's created, socialism is destined to perpetually fail. And before offering Nordic countries as evidence against me, first look at their balance sheets. For all intents and purposes they are insolvent already. It's the dead-man-walking effect. We all know they're dead, but we don't tell them.
On the other hand, a market-based pressure valve was installed on Mao's China at the end of the 90s. As a result, China has continued to point towards the left as they clearly move rightwards. Chinese leadership knew that it was a matter of time for Chinese farmers to lead a second revolution. Interestingly, the solution to the social problem came from allowing farmers property rights to their productivity and access to a free market, the two things socialism negated.
I could go on and on about the many instances where markets have solved what governments couldn't. Instead, let's look at how markets can create solutions in areas well beyond our imagination. Can markets create a way for us to protect ourselves from government?
In 2015, Obama's administration issued the Clean Power Plan. In it, they quoted EPA scientist studies claiming that thousands of premature deaths would be prevented by the plan by 2030. Like with many other EPA and NASA reports, the Obama administration had no problem bending the truth beyond the point of obvious failure. But no one in government was going to say anything about it. All insiders, those people who perpetually work in government regardless of the party controlling the White House, generally vote Democrat. Why? It's simple, Democrats want more government. If you work for a company called government, don't you want it to grow? Well, all these insiders, now called the Deep State, understandably act in favor of those who want to bring more money to Washington. To them, Obama was something close to a God.
This meant that citizens in the US would never have a chance to see any other wrongdoings of Obama's administration.
Enter the market solution. The United States has different not-for-profit organizations that focus 100% on uncovering corruption in government. These are not agitators. There are no street demonstrations. There is no partisan agenda nor intent to manipulate the media or their message. These organizations are funded by citizens who support them through voluntary donations and without the need for a government enforced, gun-to-the-head tax.
Let's look at Judicial Watch. The oldest and most reputed of all such government watchdogs, Judicial Watch exclusively acts through the legal system. They first find areas of possible corruption. Next, they use either legal petitions or lawsuits to obtain evidence that will prove more disprove such corruption. Like all other market tools, Judicial Watch creates transparency in an environment where perpetrators malevolently hide everything.
Freedom Of Information Act
Based on the Freedom Of Information Act, often called FOIA, Judicial Watch requested the EPA to produce the study behind Obama's Clean Power Plan claims. Obviously the EPA did not want to cooperate. Thankfully, Judicial Watch is this patient is any. They know that every action they take is only one in a long chain. They continued with lawsuits after lawsuits. Eventually, they succeeded.
The scientific report says nothing about premature death prevention. The mystery that again. The scientific paper covered nothing relating to saving deaths.
The final stage in Judicial Watch's efforts is the press release where the truth finally comes out. Obama lied. This is not the only lie that they have proven any will not be the last, as there are thousands of lawsuits pending.
But if you think the judicial watch is an anti-environments or anti-left organization, think twice. They're also investigating Trump's government expenses for personal matters. In a nutshell, they go after everybody in government.
Just don't hold your breath thinking that CNN, Reuters or MSNBC will talk about any of Judicial Watch's uncovering of corruption activity by the Deep State and the Democrats. Such information can only be found through the new media. Here, the market has also created an army of former reporters and media producers who, after being dissatisfied with the pervasive corruption, have launched hundreds of YouTube channels of real investigative reporting.
Yes I know the noise of bad information on the web is loud and ever present, but in no time the new market will create the necessary transparency for people to transition from the old fake media to a new source of reliable news.
While the debate between socialism and free markets will continue, there are a couple of undeniables to ponder.  Big government has brought rampant corruption to Washington like no one expected. Also, big media has colluded with big-corrupt government to misinform the people. It is ironic that markets are creating solutions to both.
Vivan los Mercados!



The kind of work Judicial Watch does:

Saturday, August 19, 2017

Currency Cloud; Doubling-Down on a Fractured Inflationary Policy

Do you really hold title on property that's stored on the cloud? I don't know about you, but I don't trust the cloud. There is something that makes me think twice about the idea of owning something that I can't store myself. Yes, I know that cloud purveyors of goods promise that we really 'do' own whatever it is that they're selling us. Yet, whether I buy music or software, I want to hold it in my possession; even at the risk of making a mistake and losing it due to a hard disk crash or something else.
Since humans begun to trade, holding title over property was essential, no matter how informal that title was. This is why, the medieval system was destined to fail. Only kings could own productive property such as land and other important resources. Let's also remember that in the communist system the concept of property title over any productive asset is eliminated. We all know where all communist systems went.
So what would you say if I told you that we are now briskly moving towards a cloud-based monetary system. The International Monetary Fund, the only central bank type in the world with a clean balance sheet, created the SDR's as a direct replacement for all world currencies; especially the dollar. An SDR is a Special Drawing Right, a debt instrument no different than the US dollar, issued by the International Monetary Fund.
Central banks around the world understood in 2008 that our present inflation-based monetary system based on the dollar as an exchange currency died the moment that real estate problems in the US affected the whole world. The patient almost died. As a result, all sorts of untested monetary drugs were created. These drugs were given to the patient in overdose fashion. Every major central bank around the world loaded its balance sheet with anything they could: government bonds, real estate, corporate debt and stock. But to understand why, we have to look back.
At the end of the 1990s, the main financial institutions in the world got together to rescue Long Term Capital Management, one of their own. This hedge fund managed by Nobel laureates faced collapse and damage to the financial system as their mathematical models drove them to overinvest in a defaulting Russia. This was a case where banks bailed banks out.
But in 2008, it was these banks that needed a bigger balance sheet to rescue them. This is where central banks entered the picture.
So what now that all the central banks around the world have destroyed their balance sheets? What will happen in the next recession? Who's going to rescue the central banks? The only institution with a clean balance sheet left his International Monetary Fund. To understand inflationary monetary fund one must understand Ponzi schemes. Both require larger players to enter the game. Yet, both will fail eventually. The catastrophic outcome increases in size as the Ponzi scheme gets bigger.
However, changing the monetary system is more than just changing one paper money for another. In the past, we went from gold or silver to paper, for example. This time, central bankers want to change the way property title works when dealing with money. They want to eliminate the cash-based society altogether.
At first sight, one could think that because of our extensive use of credit cards, we already have a cashless system. But this is not what central bankers think about when looking at cash.
Recently, interest rates when negative in several European countries. In essence, the lender pays the borrower a premium in exchange for the borrower placing the lender's money at risk of loss. Throughout history, if the borrower put the lenders money at risk, it is the borrower who had to pay the premium.
If assets like money or labor are free, how many should you get? All that you can, of course. So if money or labor pay you for taking advantage of them, how many should you get? I guess the only answer is: infinite. This is the absurd result from letting academics control our lives. To them, it's just a simple mathematical formula.
So how did citizens respond to negative interest rates punishing their savings? Instead of infinite spending or infinite lending they took the money out of the banks and held it in cash. This is because no matter where interest rates are, positive or negative, cash is a zero interest debt instrument. Consequently, central bankers went crazy. Their beautiful formulas didn't work. So what to do next? Perhaps rethink the formulas? No! Let's eliminate the stinky cash. Let's make all money virtual. In that way, no one can take money out of their interest rates system. Let's say that again. In a cashless society, there is no place to hide from central bankers.
Stock and commodities traders everywhere know that, when markets are extremely volatile, staying in cash is a very viable riskless alternative. Well, so much for that. No one will ever be able to do that again; or at least until we realize central bankers are not looking after our best interest.
But like everything else, a cashless society will also place every citizen within closer reach of government and those who influence it most. A real scary thought.
The IMF made China responsible for the launch of the SDR. In August of 2016 China issued the first debt instruments within the SDR system. Visit www.acchain.org for more information about their progress. Their immediate goal is to securitize assets with these SDR's. Think about it. Securitizing US real estate during the early 2000s wasn't enough for bankers around the world. By the time those so-called assets were passed through the derivatives machine, bankers were really happy. Yet, everyone lost all sense of where real value lied. When the real estate bubble blew up, many were unsure of who owned the asset in the end. Many foreclosed properties stayed in limbo as it wasn't clear who in a series of titleholders was the final owner of the debt. It was akin to a musical chairs game where multiple people ended over a single chair.
https://www.acchain.org/en/ret_operation.html
The first SDR's in China where backed by tea leafs. One way to understand this is to simply look at commodity futures; contracts of things like cattle and coffee. Yes again, futures are derivatives that allow for extensive speculatory trading. Counting all gold future contracts being traded at any one time will prove that most of them are being traded for speculation and will never be turned in for commodity delivery. There are a lot more contracts that goods available. Moreover, while Goldman Sachs has every intention of making money from gold price fluctuations, they have no interest in receiving truckloads of bullion at contract expiration. As such, SDR create a natural shortcut for speculation.
The first real estate residential community in Dallas, Texas is been securitized with SDR's. Due to US regulations, no Americans can participate in such SDR's. Well, I'm sure Goldman Sachs has a way of going around the rules. But I sure can't participate.
It does sound fantastic to think that our next global currency will be based with real assets. But who said citizens would barter with SDR's?
Enter crypto currencies. The recent craze for Bitcoin and all the other copycaters represents the best early Christmas gift central bankers never asked for. They fell in love as soon as they got their hands on it. Let me explain.
One of the problems central bankers have is how to convince citizens to switch from physical currency to cloud-based currency. Fortunately for them, the market has created a solution to their dilemma. Central bankers don't have to convince anyone. People are tripping over themselves as they bid up the price of crypto currencies in fear to be left out.
I know that the promise of crypto currencies is one of a system that lies outside of government watch and control. But the IMF and central bankers are not keeping the secret; they have publicly announced their love for crypto currencies. Have you noticed the recent headlines that Goldman Sachs is recommending its customers to buy Bitcoin? Coincidence? Give me a break. After seeing the depth of corruption in our US system, I'm even in doubt of what real mom is. From Google, to Facebook, to Goldman Sachs, to Bank of America, to my local electoral polling system, I don't trust any of them. Here in Broward County, just south of where I live, there are 40% more registered voters than citizens. Broward county was won, hands down, by the Democrats. We even have 140-year-old voters who seem to love the Democrats.
Bank of America Refuses Cash
For Mortgage Payment
And if that's not enough cheating, asking to get more than $1,000 in cash from my Bank of America account could get me arrested. It seems that the bank's liabilities are now backed by my money in their possession. Understand this: If they fail, government won't have to bail them out. I am going to bail them out without being asked. It's all part of the new contracts every US citizen unknowingly signed.
So, are you still excited about having a cloud-based society? Ponder the question of who, in the end, holds title over your property and money? Now that crypto currencies have been incorporated into the IMF's SDR plan and after experiencing what it is to hold title over a cloud-based asset, you see how this begins to seem much more like a medieval system where the powerful reside within the castle and the rest of us toil the rented land while being the first exposed to elements and foreign attacks?
I don't know about you, but nothing about this Ponzi scheme bubble makes me like it at all. Central bankers and the IMF will promise SDR's as the next stage in a healthy and vibrant economy. I just don't buy it. We are simply gaining speed right before impacting the wall.

Article on LinkedIn

Monday, July 24, 2017

Sessions lacks the stomach to drain the Swamp; Replace with Giuliani.

composed image in color of Jeff Sessions, RudyGiuliani, the US Department of Justice seal and the US FlagWe the people elected Trump to clear the Swamp. We want all corrupt non-elected bureaucrats who permanently infest Washington, independently of political party, to lose their power and influence over our government. We want them kicked out of Washington.

Unfortunately, all Swamp creatures are actively celebrating that Attorney General, Jeff Sessions, is a nice guy that's easily pushed around by the brutal beasts. As a result, Washington is now a circus where unaccountable attorneys have absolute power and unlimited funds to revert the wish of the electorate.

We need someone with the visceral fortitude to take on the most difficult job in US history. We need our ever-reliable hero, Rudy Giuliani. Mr. President, please replace Sessions with Giuliani for Attorney General.



If you agree, sign the White House petition at the link below:

Sessions lacks the stomach to drain the Swamp; Replace with Giuliani. https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/sessions-lacks-stomach-drain-swamp-replace-giuliani

Friday, June 2, 2017

Paris Accord Not About Climate Change

composite image of various presidents shaking hands during the signing of the Paris Accord plus the logo created for the event plus the Eiffel tower at night with the claim of 1.5 degree reduction crossed out in favor of a much lower fraction
The Paris Accord that has created so much recent noise is about everything else but climate change. No need to argue the merits of the climate change argument.

When dealing with politicians, one can never focus on their headlines. The dirt leading our countries are great at coming up with platitudes. Instead, I always rely on reading the long script. Yes, I know that these texts are often opaque and circular in logic. That's exactly how politicians ensure we won't figure out what they are up to.

The Paris accord is about global redistributionism. The whole concept that the rich must pay retributions to the poor for a legacy of abuse is now being played at a global scale. As the rich in this narrative, the US is supposed to pay into a fund without accountability or clear goals. Just look at how Brussels EU government has found ways to erode democracy in Europe while creating perpetual bureaucrat jobs for those who focus on making everybody feel guilty of their actions. Do you really think that the EU government is accountable? Try to fire any of them. You can't!

Concurrently, countries who are behind on the pollution race get a big-fat certificate of approval from all treaty participating nations. Go ahead, we tell, them, feel free to pollute as you wish since that would be just fair. And you thought the accord was about reducing pollution.

It is easy to hate Trump. There are many reasons. But our exit from the accord is not about Trump or about climate change merit. As I tell my little girls, "focus". Don't let the noisy media flash bright, shinny lights in front of you. If we want to reduce our impact on the environment, let's do it in a way that will actually achieve results.

Monday, November 14, 2016

Applying for the Nation's Butler Job

These days, it's impossible to look around without seeing a depressed progressive (a misnomer). From angry Soros-funded public protesters, to the usual sad face at the local retail store. 
composite image of a participation trophy at left and 2016 elections protesters through the streets of New York City at right
No participation trophies for losers; a first for Millennials
In a way, it isn't difficult to understand why things seem so bleak for so many of these grown children. Being their first election, they're struggling to cope with the fact that there won't be participation trophies handed out for all the losers. This is an unfair catastrophy, if you ask them.
Then there is the fact that many have forgotten their civics classes that clearly covered our electoral system. The US is not a strict democracy. No, our elections operate through a proxy-type-of-democracy. Unfortunately for anyone complaining, the rules have been the same for pretty-much ever. So, history has proven that a winner of a popular vote (all votes counted) could actually lose to the winner of the electoral vote (the proxy-votes). So, nothing to see here people; MoveOn (pardon the Soros pun).
In my opinion, the whole thing is just noise. Sallie Krawcheck, a so called LinkedIn Influencer, recently wrote an article, A Letter to Young Women, in the Age of Trump, for the LinkedIn audience where she cried about how terrible things are for women after Trump's win. Aside from being a poorly written article, a sign of her desperation to get as much verbiage published at different media outlets, as quickly, as possible, her circular logic suggests that life is now impossible to explain to our young female citizens. Since I could not stand the hyperbolic fallacy, I wrote a response. This short comment clearly explains my feelings about not only the present civil discontent but about what being a president of a country is all about. So, I thought it a best to also share it with my great readers. I hope you enjoy it.


Reply to LinkedIn article A Letter to Young Women, in the Age of Trump
Can I get a progressive/liberal member card to call myself an Influencer like Sallie despite the lack of merit?
Sallie, I have two daughters and a wife. Yes, I am the only male at home. The first thing I taught all of them was to never whine and to fight harder than everyone else. In other words, to follow my example. While I could play the immigrant card, I refuse to do so. Instead, I prefer to earn my rewards. I can't stand the concept of awarding participation-trophies. 
Image of Green Party's 2016 candidate Jill SteinDifferent that your experience, I think this is a great time to learn. During the present elections, I made sure that my daughters understood their vulnerable nature when exposed to a corrupt media. From Facebook, to Reuters, to the BBC, to Univision, to the New York Times, all media decided to create a distorted world around the most corrupt woman in US politics. The media treated Clinton as the only choice for president for being the only female in the race, all while Jill Stein of the Green party observed. Yes, the media actively discriminated against a woman. What a double standard.
Interestingly, the media drunk so much of their own KoolAid that they reached a sustained state of inebriation. Consequently the hangover was brutal. I suggest that your feelings are a simple reflection of such binge. Rather than objectivity, the media promises fairness; as in re-arranging-the-chess-pieces fairness. I find that it is this so called fairness that, when consumed in large regurgitated amounts, is terrible to your health. 
Me, I prefer to digest my own raw and objective data. I don't like all the editorial hormones that the media injects. As a result, I can see that Trump is no saint, that the Clintons deserve an extended isolation vacation with all meals paid by our tax dollars, and that if we finally fix our country's balance sheet my daughter's future will be better. 
The president of the United States is not supposed to be a role model. The job calls exclusively for a person responsible for administering our home while being accountable to our family, 'we the people'. 
Picture of Trump and Anthony Senecal, Donald J Trump's 30 year butler
Donald Trump's butler of 30 years, Anthony Senecal
In other words, we are hiring a butler/housekeeper for the nation. If our butler/housekeeper overspends, mismanages resources, creates household divisions, etc. we can immediately fire him/her. I don't know about you, but I certainly wouldn't hope for the butler to become the role model for my daughters to emulate as they grow . I also don't think that the butler should come and tell me what to eat or how to love my children. 
I feel Trump will do a great job because he is tremendously eager to take on the butler job. While Hillary relaxed her campaign efforts, relying on her ability to blow through money and to cheat anyone in her path, Trump woke up earlier and went to bed later than everyone else. To me, this is a butler worth giving a chance. Remember, Trump is neither going to convert into my daughters dad nor my household's savior. He will just be the house's administrator. Nothing else needs to be explained to young women. I can assure you, my daughters understood the lesson very well.

Friday, June 24, 2016

Congratulations to Britain!

Image of the British flag in front of a sky with fireworks
BREXIT
Once again, the British nation has acted with courage and decorum. They have followed the most difficult of paths knowing that they were doing the right thing. To all my British friends I send you a resounding thank you for continuing to be our inspiration.
Having lived in the UK, I know firsthand that the United States has no other partner as solid and as reliable as the British nation. I am also witness to their strong sense of identity and individuality. No, the Brits are not European. They are Brits. The only way for an American to relate is to see how Texans are Texans. Don't dare to tell a Texan that they are either southerners or mid-westerners. They are Texans before anything else. 
This time, the Brits faced their challenge with the same kind of resolution that they displayed when being incessantly bombed by the Nazis during the Second World War. We all know that the French just folded as soon as they saw Nazi hats. But the Brits stood despite incredible destruction all around them. 
image of Carta Magna
Magna Carta
History has shown that the British nation will always do the right thing. They first gave average people a path to a better living thanks to the Magna Carta. They started one of the most incredible global advances thanks to the Industrial Revolution. They first understood the double face nature of central-national management and bloated-bureaucracies. And now, they faced the so called Globalists which want to destroy democracy in the name of a safe future for the powerful and wealthy. Yes, people like George Soros have long proposed a world vision that would safeguard their wealth. 
First, Globalists promote a world where populations have no way to defend themselves from tyrannical governments. Look at Venezuela. People are dying daily from starvation, from a lack of clean water and from a total absence of medicine. Yet, people can't defend themselves. The political way-out has been completely eliminated by a government that changes the constitution and laws whenever it wants. Moreover, the army and the militia are both controlled by the government while arms are made illegal for citizens to own. The Globalists talk about weapons as the cause of all evil, but their plan is simply to create defenseless societies that will comply to all government demands. 
picture of crows waiting in line for any leftover food at a Venezuelan supermarket. In the foreground, garbage abounds.
Venezuela: A Compliant Society
Second, the Globalists are not about global markets, they are instead about globally controlled governments. Unfortunately their "global" name creates the illusion that they are seeking economic well being for people. But they don't. They initially tried to scare the people of Britain by telling them that the Brits would lose access to the EU's markets and that it would mean an end of their economy. But the Brits new better. Whether adjusted to GDP or on a per-capita basis, Switzerland sells more stuff to Europe than the UK despite not being part of the EU. Switzerland doesn't even have to pay the massive taxes the Brits have to in order to be part of the bureaucratic club. So the Swiss get the benefit without the fees. Why couldn't the Brits do the same. Furthermore, the Brits are not the sellers to Europe but buyers. They buy much more from the EU than they sell to it. Do you think that the Germans will say no to selling to the UK? They would be crazy.
So the Brits realized that all the scare tactics from the powerful elites were simple bluffs. They also understood that the European Community has created a massive government with great regulatory power over British citizens but without any accountability. Bureaucrats in Brussels pass rules in secret that affect all citizens while they face no concern for losing their jobs. The EU is a safe heaven for all retired politicians. They simply can't get fired while enjoying great salaries paid by the people of member nations. Yes, this is the real Globalist vision. To them, the best government is one where power over people is abundant but accountability to the same people is nonexistent. 
Do you think that Americans are immune to central management with impunity? 
Illustration of hands with banners opposing the FED and its existence over a black background.
The FED: incredible power without accountability
How about the Federal Reserve. They completely overshadow all other market participants in the economy. Our future is 100% dependent on their decisions. Yet, the Fed is not elected and thus fear nothing about losing their jobs due to an upset public.  
Finally, the Globalist want central management. Yes, they promote the same type of central government as that from all communist countries of yore but without the loss of property rights that happens in Communism. The Globalists call this Socialism. The right unfortunately calls it Big Government, which misses the real issue completely. By having a government that promotes public dependency rather than independence, Globalists ensure safety for their families and property. No risk of a Bastille-like revolution where kings would lose all. Instead, Globalists want a big and powerful government to protect their property. But their plans have no regard to the fact that central management has failed in every country it has ever been tested. Again, look at Venezuela and the total absence of toilet paper and basic necessities like medicine. 
Image of an International Monetary Fund's SDR in black and white
SDR's for more global inflation
It is just like smoking. It would be easy to talk to a smoker who swears they'll face no harm from smoking and who offers her experience as evidence. She shows you that she is in great health.
Europe is already there. They already have the disease. But like all smoke-addicts, they simply don't see that their seeming success has only been tested over a very short term when placed within a historic frame. Yes, fifty years of Socialism are nothing when compared to say the Roman Empire. They should know better, especially under the circumstances they already face. Think of it, Europe is just getting started with Socialism and they are already looking at building a government that will protect the powerful when the system fails and people try to get out of it. Moreover, the International Monetary Fund is already testing SDR's; the future global currency that will allow central bankers to continue to inflate, thus maintaining the illusion of financial growth while allowing governments to operate while insolvent. Thankfully the Brits figured the risk before they had to face an American-style secession war to get out of the EU. We could call it a near-miss. 
The Brits have served us a great lesson in civility, again!
Thank you.

After the article was published, Nigel Farage, the architect of Brexit, addressed the European Parliament. If you like British humor, his speech was a gas. Enjoy the video that captured the moment: